What's the difference then? Both can offer huge fame and heaps of enthusiastic fans, but who can give you a lasting effect?
Music industry is a little buoyant. Nowadays, YouTube has been the sturdy stepping stone for the amateur artists who want instant fame. Browse the site itself and you'll find thousands of aspirants, waiting to be noticed by talent agents.
But here's the point. You might not have the best vocal power or be a music genius to be called as somewhat "successful" and "renowned" music artist. If you have the charisma, and yeah, looks, you can easily surpass other great artists. Let's all admit that not all of them are really gifted vocally, to name a few - Paris Hilton, Jesse McCartney and Britney Spears, but they're freakingly famous. I agree it's not the voice alone as the major criteria, but the audience find it a good talent for those who have an excellent voice. For sure we'll be surprised if one day the Billboard has already become the habitat of stereotypes.
Unlike in the music industry, sports has been more demanding. You cannot be just an ordinary or average player. And really, I've never heard a very well-known athlete who plays okay on his entire career. Superstars like Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods or David Beckham will never be in the limelight of sports industry if they would just be contented to be mediocre. They outshone every other athlete because of their remarkable performances.
However, obviously it's really an arduous road for the novices for them to have a good turn since those great athlete are whom given a massive break. It will take you as much as years to establish a good name in the sports industry.
Who's greater, and who's not?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment